Well, when I say caustic, I mean dry, to the point, listing the events as relayed to me, making clear that the additional payment is not the only issue with the order, but part of a pattern. I’ve included the itemised builder’s quote for the cost of the conservatory, so the manufacturer has the opportunity to rebutt that assertion, as well as rebutt the timeline.
As for “proof” that they forgot to add glass in the price, the only proof I have is being shown two emails from the same person in the company, one admitting to the error, and the other pointing out the company “no losses” policy (whatever that means), dates of delivery and the offer of a discount, as well as the job number, eminating from an email of the format xxx.xxxxx@crystal-direct.co.uk. I see the marketing director monitors social media accounts, including Trust-Pilot (to be honest, the online reviews, good or bad, I take with a pinch of salt, because how many conservatories does one buy in a lifetime, to judge whether they are good or not), and has posted their full contact details.
As for the garage roof, I agree about concerns with the timbers, though they “look” ok. The quote includes replaciing the plywood boards and facias. But the cost of replacing a joist, once all the plywood boards are off, seems pretty incidental, £60-100, and if they need replacing, they need replacing. I am prepared for a worst case, though the quote is basically for the “most likely worst case” (ie. the plywood boards are scrap).
Along with garage mechanics, I hate builders, and their mates. But then, I work in an profession where there are real world consequences to mistakes.
On the otherhand, the electrician has been brilliant, and between us, we are planning a snazzy rewire of the garage, as he also undestands what I’m looking for (also into cars). No co-ckups on the billing, and what he has charged for seems a bargain, when I think about the time he has spent on things, and his pretty precise approach to his work.