MX5 production (factories)

My understanding is that Mazda has two factories, Hiroshima and Hofu and that the VIN code indicates which one the car was built at.

Brian Long’s book “Mazda MX5. The Full Story” (2002 edition, page 55) says (caption to a photo) “produced almost exclusively in Hiroshima, although for a brief spell during the boom of the 1990s, it was built at Hofu. Once demand subsided, production shifted back to Hiroshima.”

Another book, James Taylor’s “Mazda MX5 and Miata 1989-1999” has on page 127 an explanation showing how to interpret the VIN No. This states that the two digits BEFORE the final six digits will be either 00 or 01.

It states that 00 is Hiroshima and 01 is Hofu.

I have also seen on the internet several sites offering the same info. Some state that this first zero must be disregarded and that the factory code is simply either:-

0 - Hiroshima

1 - Hofu.

What they do all seem to agree on is that the final 0 is Hiroshima and 1 is Hofu - EXCEPT for one (very significant) site - MX5parts, whose relevant page clearly states that 1 is Hiroshima and 0 is Hofu.

Who is correct? The weight of evidence suggests that MX5parts are in the wrong. If so, I am surprised that someone hasn’t already drawn the attention of MX5parts to this oversight which, I suspect, has led Paul W to make this comment earlier today (to my earlier posting):-

(Mike, you’ve got me interested, too!

I do know from the chassis number that my car wasn’t built in the Hiroshima factory, unlike most MX-5s, but in Hofu.

As was yours!

What I find interesting is that my car doesn’t appear to have suffered from rust like many other, later Mk2s have (that’s the reason I bought this particular example). I wonder if the lack of rust is because the paint shop was a different one.)

My chassis plate shows ‘0’ so I believe it to be made in Hiroshima. Paul doesn’t quote his chassis number but says it is the same as mine! Paul goes on to make the very relevant comment that a lack of rust (on his car) might be down to being made at a different factory. But the weight of evidence (as shown above) is that both our cars did come out of the Hiroshima factory.

To summarise therefore, can someone more expert than me (I’m only a newbie) give a definitive ruling on whether Hiroshima is 0 or 1 - and then perhaps someone in a senior position within the OC needs to have a word with MX5parts.

MikeD.

(I believe I did also see an earlier posting on the forum stating that 0 is Hiroshima and 1 is Hofu but I didn’t make a note of where/when this was. Sorry.)

Some mention here:

https://www.mx5oc.co.uk/forum/yaf_postsm604916_Na-Nb-Nc-Nd------what-does-the-N-stand-for.aspx

The 10th digit (zero) is a dummy on most UK MX-5, it’s there to make the VIN uo to 17 digits. Recently Mazda has been using the 10th digit across the range to denote the model year. I think the RX-8 R3 was the first model to use this.

What about Eunos models as their VIN numbers are different?

Is there a way of working out where they were built?

Someone may know but it’s not information that I have. The Japaneses EPC that some dealers have acess to may have that information stored.

I’d guess that they are all Hiroshima built, I only know of early black NA MX-5s (The SE) with a Hofu factory code. Unless someone can show me different.

Edit: I suppose that means that black Eunos of similar age may be Hofu built too.

Yes, my car is a black one.

In my earlier posts with Mike, regarding our early NBs, I was relying on the chassis codes info given on the MX-5 parts website. I’m very willing to be corrected if the info they publish is incorrect but I was directed there by more experienced owners and have never before read any indication that this is wrong.

I’d just like to know the definitive answer about the history of the marque. Either way, it appears that mine is one of the first 1,000 or so Mk2 cars built (but again, the info I’ve used is the above website). :wink:

From Mazda’s NB training manual

RR, Many thanks. Looks like Hiroshima built it was, then, after all.

Last four digits of my car’s VIN are 10**. First registered 7 April 1998. No body rust so far. That OE Classic black paint must be good stuff.

That’s pretty conclusive, so who has a good relationship with MX5parts and can diplomatically suggest to them that they correct their details which are clearly leading owners astray?
MikeD.

There were 4 black 1.8 cars produced for the UK between VIN 100001 and VIN 100199. 1 10104*, 2 10105* and 1 10106*…

I’ve politely made MX-5parts aware on your behalf…

 

I’ve added an NA VIN decoder to the Technical folder in the Downloads section. I’ll add NB, NC and ND ones in the near future. 

NB, NC & ND VIN decoder sheet now uploaded also.

Hello RR,

Thank you for that. I’m sure other members will find it a useful piece of info.

Mike.

Could you tell me where I find the Downloads section, please.

On the top blue bar of the Forum page, between Events and Join the Club.