This is the reason why many people sell these systems.
Stainless steel systems tend to be noisier and more resonant. A fine line between what is desirable/acceptable and what is just irritating, depending on the car, owner preference, driving conditions and system fitted.
I assume there is a cat fitted rather than decat as this will quieten the system down. the back box is likely part of your system so any idea to replace it will involve removal of the system anyway.
MX5Parts may take it back - worth a try but at the end of the day this was your choice and I assume the system supplied is doing the job it was designed for. Many of us stick to standard systems or revert back to them for the reasons you have discovered.
I recently fitted the IL Motorsport stainless steel exhaust from MX5 Parts and it is not much louder than the standard exhaust it replaced. The sound is a bit more sporty but subtly so and it doesn’t drone on the motorway. I really like it
Just my personal opinion but I’d say you can’t go wrong with a Cobalt exhaust from Moss. Lovely sporty note, not too loud and, for me at least, no droning sound when on the motorway. It sounds a bit ‘tinny’ at first but once you’ve put a few miles on it the sound deepens to a lovely growl. Also, the Cobalt is cheaper than most other aftermarket S/S exhausts.
Could not agree more, Cobalt is the way to go and when on offer is much cheaper than other suppliers although you might have to wait a while for the next offer.
Had mine over a year now and still enjoy the sound it makes.
Took the opportunity to replace the Cat, hangers and a new oxygen sensor at the same time.
Oddly enough, ( and I run 2 Mx5’s) one a '94 and the other a 2002 Sport.
I had to remove the Mk1’s SS exhaust ( same as yours) as the combination of the SS decat & 'zorst was far too boomy right between 65/75 mph, and I reverted to an OEM exhaust which, with the decat in place, gave a nice cloth-ripping note.
On the Mk2.5, which still has it fitted, yes…it’s a bit boomy at exactly the same speeds but since the CAT is still fitted as it has to be, it’s nowhere near as bad and is “acceptable”.
I think these engines, like any other, have a resonance period around 3/3.5k unfortunatley equating to top gear motorway cruising.
It may be…there is more to it with a combo of rev related compressions & gas compressions etc. That’s a science beyond me tbh.
Back in the day for another example, the Capri 2.8i V6 engines (when older) sometimes destroyed the (chain driven) front sprocket bolted to the crank. It had a fibre centre damper which would eventually fail…and take the engine with it. I had an all steel replacement fitted when it was being borded/stroked and tuned by Vulcan Engineering.