Currently 3 on eBay and BBR have one for sale as well. Can any previous owners on here tell me their reasons for selling after spending ÂŁ9k on the conversion?Â
To be honest some people keep cars for years after they make it their owm like after a BBR Turbo Conversion.
The majority of people after a few years or less want a ânew carâ and they have a special blindness as to how much they have spent on their existing car which they have no interest in being reminded of.
Therfore the car is a few years old an it has to be sold for something more sensible or something else special, just the way it goes.
The company will sell of their demo cars after a while in order to either finance the lastest demonstrator car with the latest tweeks or they are maybee getting out of that maeket if they have satisfied the demand for those cars or the demand for the cars is no longer at a level to make staying in that market worthwhile.
There are numerous conversions of cars of all makes out there. They donât necessarily tick the boxes people thought they would. At the end of the day it is still an MX-5. The great thing about MX-5âs is you donât have to be going that fast to enjoy them. You make them faster and suddenly you need more space and you are still nowhere near Porsche territory or BMW 330 grunt or comfort and most people live in urban situations.Â
Interesting observation Alec and informative answers.
I would add that there are many who care not a whit about âreturn of investmentâ and never had to resort to overdrafts or the âLife of Cyclical Credit Cardsâ.
Think also of, in this day and age of speed-traps etc, how much time is spent âoff boostâ, and how often on our crammed roads to people get the chance to use 300bhpâŚapart from track events. Sooner or later, the shine dulls.Â
TBH, Iâd rather fork out 10/15k for a solid (?) BMW Z Mpower or similar. Â
Any proof of that? - Are you sure you arenât confusing the manifold issue with the early NA BBR conversions, where manifold cracks were common - and hard to replace?
Definitely had lots of issue, I bought 5 kits and they cost me thousands of pounds to put customers vehicles back to standard. This is when BBR changed their terms and conditions NOT to cover track use.
Â
BBR personally fitted a kit to my green/orange le-mans Mk3 that then caught fire at silverstone⌠I was never going to go shopping in it was I. ??Â
I think there are some barely- hidden agendas going on in this thread. The Stage Two takes power to over 300bhp and the main differences relate to a heavier-duty clutch and improved exhaust. Any turbo puts increased stress on an engine but BBR donât tweak the boost up too high (less than 10 lb psi) but stress is stress. When youâve got that power you use it rarely, so that helps. You need to drive with  bit of common sense or youâd get speeding tickets most days and your license would be revoked well before you got any problems with the car. When I got my stage 2 I wasnât entirely happy with the new clutch and Neil changed it free of charge even though it behaved perfectly when we took it out for a test drive. I canât fault his customer care. Only an idiot would provide an open-ended warranty on a vehicle which is being used for racing! Heâs got a business to run but notwithstanding that, his customer care  is excellent.
I actually removed the turbo set up from my mk2.5 and sold the complete kit.Â
Personally, BBR cars are great for daily use and the occasional fast road, but they donât like the track. I had numerous problems and had to recondition the turbo three times over 3 years.Â
NA cars where spending there whole day hammering it, whereas I had to tread around eggshells so ended up removing the lot and going for an ITB set up by BLINK.Â
I would have gone for a BBR ITB set up as its simply amazing, but BLINK are 4 hrs closer and alot more experience in building track engines.Â
Love the BBR, but donât expect a reliable track experience. Nor do they claim to be track specialists. Great factory style car and customer service is second to none.Â